ΤΡΟΠΟΛΟΓΙΕΣ ΠΟΥ ΚΑΤΕΘΕΣΕ Η ΜΑΡΙΑ ΣΠΥΡΑΚΗ ΓΙΑ ΤΗΝ ΑΠΛΟΠΟΙΗΣΗ ΤΟΥ ΕΣΠΑ ΩΣ ΕΙΣΗΓΗΤΡΙΑ ΤΟΥ ΕΛΚ - Μαρία Σπυράκη

ΤΡΟΠΟΛΟΓΙΕΣ ΠΟΥ ΚΑΤΕΘΕΣΕ Η ΜΑΡΙΑ ΣΠΥΡΑΚΗ ΓΙΑ ΤΗΝ ΑΠΛΟΠΟΙΗΣΗ ΤΟΥ ΕΣΠΑ ΩΣ ΕΙΣΗΓΗΤΡΙΑ ΤΟΥ ΕΛΚ

Screen Shot 2017-09-06 at 15.47.33

ΤΡΟΠΟΛΟΓΙΕΣ ΠΟΥ ΚΑΤΕΘΕΣΕ Η ΜΑΡΙΑ ΣΠΥΡΑΚΗ ΓΙΑ ΤΗΝ ΑΠΛΟΠΟΙΗΣΗ ΤΟΥ ΕΣΠΑ ΩΣ ΕΙΣΗΓΗΤΡΙΑ ΤΟΥ ΕΛΚ

Draft opinion

Considers that regional funding should be protected and should continue to predominantly take the form of grants rather thanfinancial instruments, which do, however, have an important role to play in certain cases; stresses that in the event of a reduction in the EU’s budgets, greater focus on the EU’s core goals is required;

Amendment

Considers that regional funding should be protected and should continue to predominantly take the form of grants, which should be complemented by financial instruments, which have an important role to play in certain cases; stresses that in the event of a reduction in the EU’s budgets, greater focus on the EU’s core goals is required;

Draft opinion

Considers that a 5+5 year MFF period might be preferable;

Amendment

Considers that a 5+5 year MFF period might be preferable, provided that the Commission ensures a smooth transition between programming periods, which would require stricter de-commitment rules, shorter procedures for closing programmes, and faster processes for the setup and start-up of programmes;

Draft opinion

Calls for the priorities of regional development programmes to be updated in order to take changing conditions into account and to benefit from new technology; also considers that more flexibility is required in the MFF to meet unforeseen challenges;

Amendment

Calls for the priorities of regional development programmes to be updated in order to take changing conditions into account and to benefit from new technology; also considers that more flexibility is required in the MFF to meet unforeseen challenges and that these new opportunities and challenges should be reflected in the specific indicators in order to measure EU’s response to them;

Draft opinion

Calls for the Commission to look into the possibilities for greater synergiesbetween the different EU funds, including cohesion policy, Horizon 2020 and EFSI;

Amendment

Calls for the Commission to further facilitate synergies and complementaritiesbetween the different EU funds, including cohesion policy, Horizon 2020, the Connecting Europe Facility and EFSI;

Draft opinion

Considers that it is essential, in the context of the new MFF, to ensure that budgetary rules, and rules on cohesion policy spending, are at last simplified.

Amendment

Considers that it is essential, in the context of the new MFF, to ensure that budgetary rules, and rules on cohesion policy spending, are at last simplified, as well as to potentially adopt the «single rule book» approach in order to encourage more beneficiaries to apply for EU funding;

06/09/2017

Κοινοποίηστε το άρθρο